Sticker Concept Board
Review a sticker or emoticon pack concept before store submission: flags generic design, resemblance to existing characters and weak market fit. Reviews a sticker or emoticon pack concept (character, expression list, theme) through three independent lenses: Copy & Concept Editor (memorable or generic, flat captions, no emotional hook), Resemblance & Brand Risk Scout (surface-level similarity to a known licensed character or competitor pack, copied poses) and Market Skeptic (oversaturated theme, missing high-frequency expressions, no reason to pick this pack). Phase 2 has the reviewers cross-examine each other, and Phase 3 tags each finding CONFIRMED, CORROBORATED or DISPUTED and ends with a submission recommendation. It is not legal advice and does not replace a trademark or copyright lawyer. It does not invent store approval criteria, competitor packs or sales data, and it does not draw or generate artwork. Text you paste is sent as-is to the model.
Example input
Use the Sticker Concept Board on this (a sample I wrote). Pack name: "Happy Bunny Daily" - 24 stickers for a messenger store. Character: A cute white bunny with big round eyes, long floppy ears, and a small red scarf. Soft pastel palette. Chubby body, tiny arms. Expression list: 1) smile, 2) big smile, 3) thumbs up, 4) waving hello, 5) heart, 6) crying, 7) angry, 8) sleeping, 9) surprised, 10) OK, 11) good morning, 12) good night, 13) thank you, 14) sorry, 15) love you, 16) cheering, 17) thinking, 18) hungry, 19) coffee, 20) rain, 21) happy birthday, 22) congratulations, 23) bye bye, 24) fighting! Theme: everyday cute chat reactions. Captions are plain text like "Hi!" and "Thanks!". The bunny's pose for "surprised" mirrors a well-known mascot's famous startled jump from a popular cartoon (I just traced the silhouette for reference). Price target: standard tier. Submit to store next week.
Example output
## Phase 1 — Independent findings ### 🎨 Copy & Concept Editor - The character has no distinguishing personality: "A cute white bunny with big round eyes, long floppy ears, and a small red scarf." Every trait is a default cute-animal trait; the draft gives no temperament or backstory. Seen out of context, a sticker would not be recognizable as this pack. Fix: give the bunny one specific quirk (a habit, a prop, a mood). - Many expressions are interchangeable: "smile," "big smile," "thumbs up," "OK," "heart." Nothing ties them to this character. Fix: rewrite each as an action only this bunny would do. - The theme has no hook: "everyday cute chat reactions." No emotional angle or use-case. - Captions are flat: "Hi!" and "Thanks!" are plain text with no voice. - Name is generic: "Happy Bunny Daily" does not suggest a character or a situation. ### 🚩 Resemblance & Brand Risk Scout - Direct reference copying: "The bunny's pose for 'surprised' mirrors a well-known mascot's famous startled jump from a popular cartoon (I just traced the silhouette for reference)." Tracing a recognizable pose is the one element most likely to get flagged by a store reviewer or the IP holder. Fix: redraw the pose from scratch, with no tracing. - Character design reads like a common genre template (white bunny, red scarf) but the draft does not name any specific existing character for it. No further specific match can be identified from the description alone. Not legal advice; check the final art against well-known bunny characters before submitting. - Pack name "Happy Bunny Daily" does not echo a trademarked pack as far as the draft shows; nothing to flag from the text alone. ### 🧐 Market Skeptic - Oversaturated theme: a cute animal saying hi, thanks, sorry, and love you. The draft gives no answer to why someone would choose this pack over dozens of similar ones. - The set is "24 stickers" of mostly generic reactions; the daily-use items are present (thank you, sorry, good morning, good night, OK), but they are undifferentiated, so they are easily replaced by other packs. - The one sticker someone would use daily is unclear: no standout "signature" sticker is identified. - Missing situational or lol/on-my-way type expressions common in chat (for example "on my way," "lol," "wait a sec") that would drive repeated use. ## Phase 2 — Cross-examination - [Editor #1 no personality] challenged by Resemblance Scout: "Not a legal issue; no challenge." / corroborated by Market Skeptic: "Same reason the pack has no answer to 'why this one over the dozens like it.'" …
Real output from running the skill on a sample problem, shortened. The skill file itself is not published here.